Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Marlo Jeskey's avatar

Oh my goodness… so so many things to say about this topic that I’ll revisit another time. For now this is one of my favorite quotes from this share:

“Christian schools exist to disciple students, to shape their hearts and minds to know and follow Jesus.

Because formation is the mission, biblical worldview integration isn’t optional or supplemental. It is the way Christian education was designed to function.”

I also couldn’t help but smile at the Ai example. 😊 …Modeling it’s fantastic use… as a tool🙌. Game changer I tell ya… game changer.

Marlo Jeskey's avatar

There are several factors that come to mind that would need to be addressed to ensure the success of implementation and minimize the risk of it becoming a “ to do list item” that gets set upon a shelf that collects dust. The following are my opinion regarding how to provide a framework to minimize faculty overwhelm and increase capacity to provide thoughtful creativity to such an endeavor.

1. What: Start by providing to the teachers, biblical worldview concepts the school views as priorities to be taught, starting with concepts that help bring continuity with the Mission, Vision, and Values of the school.

Why: For the mission, vision, values of the school to be taken seriously they need to be tied to the biblical worldview anyway. The biblical worldview concepts also needs to come from administration ( initially), because it can’t be assumed teachers know how biblical worldview concepts fit within the curriculum. The reality is that most teachers were not taught through a biblical worldview lense themselves. Even if they went to Bible college it might not have been related to subject matter across disciplines. If we want teachers to create beyond the Fruit of the Spirit, it’s best if at least at first the priorities are provided.

How: Make this a priority during teacher inservice sessions. Teach the worldview concept to the teachers. If it’s discovered they don’t agree with biblical worldview, it would be better to know this at the beginning of the year than when they avoid teaching it to students because they don’t actually believe it.

2. What: If it is a priority to create lessons that integrate biblical worldview with existing curriculum units then it’s best administration models this by making time to work on it a priority during teacher inservice days and is actively available to coach and answer questions regarding specifics when needed.

Why: If it’s not enough of a priority for administration to devote time during inservice sessions the perception will be that it must not be a serious priority. Teachers will be more likely to finish creating a lesson at home on Sat. when needed, if administration proved it was an important school project by not filling inservice with other random content that is lesser priority in reality.

How: Make this a second piece to inservice. First piece is learning the biblical worldview content during several sessions by subject. Second piece is applying the knowledge of the biblical worldview concept, to the application of connecting it to subject units. This would be done at the beginning of the year and during inservice days throughout the year,

3: What: Make it less daunting for staff by having specific grade levels focus on specific subjects to biblically integrate.

Why: This allows their mind to just focus on one conceptual application at a time. It will still allow students to get biblical worldview application alternated by subject until there is more time for the school to have more lessons as time passes.

How: 1st year of Implementation: For example K- Sosial Studies,

1st grade Science, 2nd grade History, 3rd grade Reading Comprehension… then possibly repeat…

2nd year of implementation have 2 Subjects implemented per grade, yet still staggered from the other grades so that within 2 years students can be exposed to the implementation of all 4 subjects.

Fun stuff! So appreciate this topic. 😊🙌

No posts

Ready for more?